[x]

deviantART

 

This Is Funny: Anti-Furry Coalition

Journal Entry: Thu Jun 19, 2008, 8:07 PM
Contents of this Rant:
-the Anti-Furry Coalition.
--Their Cause (and how it's flawed)
--The site

"Furry" is a pretty split subject. Although there are people who acknowledge the existence of furries and essentially ignore them, there are those whom their lives revolve around the subculture and those who regard it as a smudgy, permanent stain of terror in society. I'll admit that I'm an enthusiast, but that's not the point. Has anybody ever heard of this "Coalition?"

[link]

click on "What are Furries" and read the last two subtopics. and Definitely check out the "Resources" page. It made me laugh.

So from what I can gather, this site was made by a "Coalition" of mothers who are afraid that their sons might go around choking their chicken to cartoon fox boobs... or worse; getting their sphincters destroyed by another man (or each other) in a fox costume.

I suppose I can understand where they're coming from, they want to keep their children safe from "yiffy" materials which "allegedly" are hard to filter in search engines. They argue (and I quote) "when a youth or child looks up his favorite cartoon animal friends on the Internet, it is highly likely that he will end up finding Simba - cub or adult - performing filthy acts in pornographic images." notice the word "highly" in this quote.

So I decided to do a little research. I decided to go to four of the most popular (to my knowledge, at least) search engines and typed in "Simba" just to see what I get. I even turned off all the filters, just to see what happens (IT'S RESEARCH!) and here are my findings. You get infinity results (actually, an average of 384,339 results) of other people's cats, who's masters NAMED them Simba, a couple screenshots from the movies, and oddly enough, pictures of military automobiles. So the question comes up; I wonder what the hell their children typed into the search engine to get these "Pornographic" pictures? It was later found that all of the founding mother's children were themselves already deep into the fandom and were caught frantically touching themselves to Simba nude stocks.

Here's another thing about their inquisition, from what I gathered, there seemed to be an underlying discrimination against homosexuals and middle-aged men. The funniest thing to me is that they don't regard their crusade - to exterminate furries (at the very least, from the internet) - nothing remotely close to discrimination. They justify this by comparing them to other groups of people who have been discriminated. They claim that furries don't deserve to be accepted because it is "insulting and belittling to those groups of people who have, and many who are still fighting for equality, rights and acceptance." Among the people that they deem worthy of being accepted are: Jewish, black, homosexual, and the blind. In the end this is their argument:

Furries don't deserve to be accepted because they didn't suffer mass genocide, nor were they subjected to 350+ years of enslavement, or were they victim to cruel right-wing, conservative social stigma, nor do they have a physical disability that inconveniences their daily routines. Only if they fit one or more of the following criteria can they be accepted...

Does anybody see the "Nazi" behind this Coalition? I'm sure many of you have, but Like it says on their site: "Knowledge is the beginning".

Enough about their cause, let's talk about the site. The site itself is supposed to be a resource site where people can find out what "furries" are without running into objectionable anthropomorphic material on the internet. I don't suppose that they wanted to be objective about any of the material that they wanted to provide. Off the bat, you can tell that they want to instill their propaganda on you by immediately associating furries to porn, pushing onto you that your mind and eyes will be raped if you so much as look up the words furry fandom in... say, wikipedia. now obviously, you're not going to find the words "sources" or "bibliography" on this site... If you would look in their "resources" tab, you will see that they have prepared (Rather flimsy) propaganda fodder for the readers, to fully equip them from the furry menace. This just further proves how once-sided, narrow-minded, and fascist they are.

I'm not saying that Furry porn is non-existent or harmless (c'mon, REGULAR porn burns Jesus...) All I'm saying is that for those who DO want to find out what furries are, they should look somewhere else, and after viewing the facts from all six angles, you should THEN decide if you want to fight against it or join it. Here's something that I CAN vouch for, there are many much persons that are into the furry fandom who are also NOT into the pornographic stuff, and simply appreciate the "furries" for what it is.

anyway, until nexttime:

-Dave

Check these out:

Blog: [link]
Comic: [link]

-Cajun
  • Mood: Relief
  • Listening to: Final Fantasy VII: Voices of Lifestream
  • Watching: Smallville
  • Playing: Geometry Wars: Galaxies and Bioshock
  • Drinking: Roobios tea

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0

Hey, thanks for bringing this up and sharing it with us.

Truth of the matter is, no matter what, furries are always gonna be discriminated against. Jews and Blacks and Gays will always be too.

And there will always be extremists in the fandom as well. I myself do enjoy some furry porn from time to time. And there are even other furries that disgust me. Y'know, the ones that would genuinely give up their humanity to become an animal and whatnot.

But this whole thing is that we're letting differences set us apart. And that's what's causing all this drama and hate. People see touchy subjects like porn and bestiality and immediately shun it away, when in fact there's a whole greater community at hand.

Regardless, I'll definitely spread the word round to my furry hombres. Thanks dude!

--
>8c
Just another example of how pathetic the human race can be...

I find anthropomorphic characters entertaining - from watching "Tale Spin" in my youth to the stuff that talented folks post here.

Now I can think of one artist, that at times does nudes of these characters, and frankly I'm always left feeling ~meh~ where as clothed (even scantily) I find to be good.

But, even tho the nudes and the porn have no appeal for me, I would not support taking action against it, and yes I do have kids.

Parents have to actually RAISE their kids and not expect the computer to be their new baby sitter and chaperon... Well, we've all heard this argument before...

I have to admit, that site does smell like a Nazi in Soccer Mom clothing...

"Censorship is like telling a man he can't have steak because a baby can't chew it" -- Mark Twain

--
喜びあっさいき / ~YorokobiAssaiki / JoyCrusher

If a man speaks in the forest and there is no woman there to hear it, is he still wrong? :pray:
No I didn't visit the site, but I found this post amusing and informative.

This doesn't change the fact that I think furry parties are, like most orgies, violently disturbing. And even more so than "most orgies", because I happen to believe that zoophilia is even more violently disturbing than other fetishes.

But that's just me, not some crazy Coalition.

--
Why walk when you can run?
I think it's hilariously wrong that they added that pic of taurin fox on the what are furries tab. They so ripped that, then made it look like it was for something else, because that's not even why the artist had made that for....some people, really.

--
Like Wii? Want a chance to win one? Well, click the thingamajig down there to find out more!

[link] (yes, please!)

[link] (no, thanks)

~sweets
you know how they say that lazy people work twice as hard to gratify their own needs? This is exactly what this coalition is!

These people don't want to take care of their kids, they want them to be "normal" persons without as much as breaking a sweat in bringing them up the right way!

btw, love the Mark Twain quote.
You say furry parties are more gross than some fetishes? I'll agree having the hots for a goat is pretty high on the "disturbed" list, but what about chopping each other's arms and legs for sexual arousal or killing/swallowing whole small animals such as lizard and mice to bust a nut? I'd say those are pretty disturbing too. There was a news article once that said a man was found in the nude and dead because he was run over by his truck. The intent was for sexual arousal....

yep.... the world is pretty fucked up.
Yet again, they have now resorted to image distortion to fuel their propaganda. What a bunch of Hitler-loving Nazis...
Thanks dude!

but serious, one day, these kinds of people will start another Socialist regime. I wonder if they even hear themselves sometimes.

These are the kind of people who think that an orgasm is a myth because they never had experienced it in their 20-some odd years of a drifting marriage, only strung together by their mistake-son/daughter. These people need an elbow to the kidneys.
Yeah, and that whole "normal" concept is a whole other bucket of s**t - THERE IS NO NORMAL - only majority.

--
喜びあっさいき / ~YorokobiAssaiki / JoyCrusher

If a man speaks in the forest and there is no woman there to hear it, is he still wrong? :pray:

Journal History

Site Map